Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
Buckhead Family Law
  • Life. Forward.

Beyond the Paycheck: What Happens to Stock Options and RSUs in a Georgia Divorce

SplittingAssets

Executive compensation rarely stops at a base salary anymore. Stock options, restricted stock units, and other equity awards have become a standard part of pay packages across Atlanta’s corporate, tech, and healthcare sectors. That is great news for building wealth, but it also raises a tricky question during divorce. If part of your compensation has not fully vested yet, or is tied to future performance, how does a Georgia court decide who gets what? Atlanta property division attorneys deal with this issue regularly, and the answer is rarely as simple as a fifty-fifty split.

Georgia’s Approach to Marital Property

Georgia is an equitable division state, not a community property state, which means courts divide marital assets based on what is fair under the circumstances, not necessarily what is equal. Under the framework set out in Moore v. Moore, 249 Ga. 27 (1982), only property and assets acquired during the marriage are generally subject to equitable division. That principle applies to traditional assets like a home or bank account, but it gets more complicated when the asset in question is a bundle of stock options that were granted years ago and will not vest for several more.

Timing Is Everything

Whether stock options or RSUs count as marital property often comes down to when they were granted, when they vest, and what they were meant to compensate. Options granted before the marriage may be considered separate property, while those granted and earned during the marriage are more likely to be classified as marital. Unvested awards create an added layer of complexity, since courts have to consider whether the equity was a reward for past work already completed during the marriage, or an incentive tied to future employment that has not yet happened.

Valuing What Has Not Vested Yet

Once the classification question is settled, valuation becomes the next hurdle. Unvested RSUs and stock options do not have a fixed, guaranteed value the way a bank balance does. Their worth depends on the company’s future stock price, vesting schedules, and whether the employee stays with the company long enough to actually receive them. Courts often rely on financial experts to project a reasonable current value, sometimes using formulas that account for the portion of the vesting period that occurred during the marriage versus after separation.

Options for Dividing Equity Compensation

Depending on the details, couples may divide stock options and RSUs through a few different approaches, including offsetting their estimated value against other marital assets, agreeing to split shares as they vest, or negotiating a lump sum buyout. Each option comes with tax implications and practical trade-offs worth thinking through carefully with your legal and financial team before signing anything.

Equity compensation can be one of the more misunderstood pieces of a divorce settlement, and getting the classification and valuation wrong can cost real money down the line. Buckhead Family Law helps clients throughout the Atlanta area untangle these issues so nothing gets overlooked. For guidance on protecting your share of stock options, RSUs, or other complex assets, our Atlanta property division lawyers are ready to sit down and walk through your specific situation with you.

Source:

law.justia.com/cases/georgia/supreme-court/1982/38280-1.html

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Fill Out the Form Below

By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation